Woven In

I don’t make a practice of photographing people in my perambulations through Glasgow, but I thought this guy would go nicely with my post today. He’s Irish. Know how we know? Because that’s an Irish pipe… apparently not a bagpipe. These things are explained to me, and I just say, “Uh-huh,” and keep my bewilderment to myself. (Honestly, does it not look JUST LIKE a Scottish pipe? Apparently if we could see the other side of it, one of the …drone thingies would be over his shoulder instead of hanging down like it would be with a Scottish one. To which I say, “Whatev.”)

Busy days, busy days. Trying to re-imagine one character’s total relationship to another one is about the equivalent of picking out a single thread of color from a tapestry, following it all the way through the under-over-under-over weaving, and …redyeing it. It’s the subtle, small changes that change everything in a piece of art. It’s the kind of fiddly work that sometimes I can only do in small doses, and then I have to get up and wander around. I’ve been working, and in between that I’ve been reading old books — this morning I finished Emma Bull’s War for the Oaks, and sighed in perfect happiness for five whole minutes. Such a good book.

And then, back to work.

I don’t remember who linked to this one first, but I was passed along to the blog of Sara Zarr by several people in the last couple of days. Sara blogs about finding herself Photoshopped for an author photograph she took. She posts Real Sara, Fake Sara shots of herself, and I find myself wanting to quietly batter the photographer over the head with his laptop. Especially for a writer like Sara, who writes about girls learning to love and accept themselves as themselves, the specifically-not-requested Photoshopping is condescending, sexist and …invasive. The photographer obviously has ideas about what makes a woman look better. Too bad he didn’t choose to keep them to himself. Well done and hearty bravas to Sara for making the photographer use the original images of her, and then writing about it.

Of course, the happiest — and most amusing discovery of the last day or so is Neil the Gorgeous Gaiman on Comedy Central. I am eternally grateful to Leila at Bookshelves of Doom for posting it, ’cause I can’t see Stephen Colbert here in the UK (BOO!). I cracked up as Stephen Colbert read the first line of The Graveyard Book, and scolded Gaiman for frightening small children. Wellll. He frightened a couple of big ones, too, but really, I got over it. Bod is lovely.

I also appreciate how The Colbert Show is melding popular culture and literature. When Colbert had poet Elizabeth Alexander on the show after the inauguration, I was hoping that non-political writers would return more often, and YES! They’re on the show in spades now. Way to make literature accessible, people. Smart, smart move.

Meanwhile, the Savage Chickens are pretty sure that Samuel L. Jackson and St. Patrick are the same person. Since I haven’t seen Snakes on a Plane, I’m just not sure…

Aaaaaaaaaaand now it’s time to go back to work. Ciao for now.

6 Replies to “Woven In”

  1. I don’t care if I’m being cheap. I love those leather “trousers.” And I really do think there is definitely something karmic about you and bagpipes in general.

  2. Oh, Charlotte, WOW!!!!!!!

    Wow.
    Okay. Spanish pipes. Which totally blows my half-hearted St. Patrick’s tribute anyway. A si es la vida, I guess…

    Thank you to Mr. Charlotte for the correction.

  3. Hi Tanita,

    Actually, that set of pipes is, according to my husband, who plays the Irish pipes, is the Spanish gaita Gallega. For what that’s worth!

    Irish pipes can only be played sitting down…so tight leather trousers are perhaps not so comfy.

    (If you’ve ever listened to Loreena McKinnet’s The Mask and the Mirror, you’ve heard my husband…)

  4. Heee! Sara! You read my mind. His TROUSERS (hon, if you say pants here, people laugh at you. It’s a nasty little snicker, and then they say “D’ye mean his TROUSERS?,” and you duck and get all embarrassed; pants are underwear. I am reminded of this constantly. And LEATHER PANTS… good grief.) are amazing… I wondered if you just had to undo one string and you’d be down to buckles…?

    Okay, I shall not go there. *ahem*

  5. Great links, Tanita. I passed that Sara Zarr link on to a photographer friend who actually DOES photograph real women, exactly how they are. (7-Imps in doing an interview with her this Sunday, I think.)

    Also love Neil + Stephen. Almost too much hotness for one screen.

    Now is it cheap of me to wish you had also blogged about that piper’s pants?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.