On Comebacks and Carrying On

I don’t write resolutions.
I am horrible. horrible, horrible at consistency. The only routine I have is randomness, so there’s really no point in resolutions for me.
What I do like to do is create opportunities to start over again. The end of a season, the beginning of a new year — these are reasonable times to start over.

I was replying to AF’s thoughts on the new year, and my comments got long enough to be their own post! So, no goals to share, just a few thoughts that can be applied to anything:

“Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never—in nothing, great or small, large or petty—never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense.” – Sir Winston Churchill

Need a bit more? “When you’re going through hell, keep going.” – also a Churchill quote.

I think of salmon swimming upstream, when I think of writing. Yeah, it’s about that hard sometimes, but every year, salmon get the job done. Bears, shallow water, eagles and losing their way don’t stop that homing instinct from operating. They make the effort regardless of the difficulty.

Our writing group has a mock “wall of shame” where we report to each other our rejection letters. Even as we admit our failures, we are also admitting our attempts. Failure, in the face of unremitting attempt, is transient. It, too, shall pass…

Another skill salmon possess is the ability to change the direction of their attack. They’re always heading home, but the difference between leaping up between these two rocks on the left, and above this chipped rock on the right is small. I think human beings don’t know how to change direction enough. Sometimes as writers we feel our identity is tied up in a certain kind of writing. It’s worth considering nonfiction if you only write fiction, a female protagonist if you only write males, a story about a mother and daughter if your work is overpopulated with fathers and uncles. And it can go deeper than that. Really looking at your work will show you themes and theories that you constantly espouse. Are they true? Could they use an update? A change might do you good…

Salmon can’t quit. It’s not up to them to decided, “Ah, didn’t want to go back to the spawning ground anyway.” If you have a writing group and friends to keep you honest, you’ll find you have no choice, either. People in your corner are the best gift you can give yourself. A writer is sometimes only as strong as their writing group.

Persist. The only way to make a comeback is to continue onward. Think of all of the entertainers and sports personalities who have made comebacks — repeatedly, in some cases. They simply trained and rehearsed and leaped into the national consciousness again. It’s possible for anyone.

Attitude, they say, is everything. Since it’s not over ’til you say so, don’t.


*Click on the graphic if you can’t see it clearly. The little puzzle says, “What’s the difference between what you think and what you do — and what you’re doing?” Seriously: a point to ponder.

Crazy Flakes and Wintry Blasts

Oh! My word! Did you see that AMAZING cycleflake? Or the Scotland themed one? Or the gorgeous
butterfly? Keep your eyes open – there beauties on the auction block! Check with Seven Impossible Things Before Breakfast for day Twenty-Four of the Illustrations of Awesomeness known as Robert’s Snow.


Writers: If you don’t have time to read this today, print the page, bookmark the website, do something. Ypulse’s Anastasia has some really awesome tips on how to sell your book sans Ms. Winfrey. (Although, I’m sure she’d take the Oprah Bump should Oprah choose to bump her!)

Today, Salon is excerpting, “Red: The Next Generation of American Writers — Teenage Girls — on What Fires Up Their Lives Today,” edited by Amy Goldwasser (Hudson Street Press, 2007) Listen to the voices — tough, cynical, grieving, knowing — of four teens. Experience from the horse’s mouth.

Deborah Davis on teens in the juvenile system — and their access to books. Colleen has already suggested that juvenile halls are a great place to donate books — kids doing time have nothing much to entertain them. Books can make a difference here, people.

Yesterday, I heard a poem whose last lines have really stuck with me. “The Hour” by Michael Lind, (from Parallel Lives © Etruscan Press, 2008) closes with these words:

…soon, though the hour
Comes to corrode all your power,
Pleasure and faith, with the damp dread that it daily assigns you.
How you evade it defines you.

That strikes such a chord.
May you be well-defined.

History, MEM’s, Odds & Ends

“So why do we teach history to our children? Is it for the glow of pleasure we get when we hear their cherubic little mouths repeating the names and dates of all the kings and queens since Edward the Confessor, each battle they fought, every treaty they signed and every head they (personally) struck from renegade shoulders? Or is history principally about humanity? Understanding when leadership becomes tyranny and why holocausts and genocides happen?”

Beth Webb, author of the fabulous Star Dancer series talks about fiction having just as much importance as fact when children select books on historical fiction. Is there a such thing as misleading children with the fictional aspects of historical fiction?


OH. MY. Can you spot the SINGLE correct usage in this window?!




Harper Lee has been known for years as one of the most reclusive writers in our modern world. Her book was so timely a reminder of the realities of segregation and the equal rights struggle that she seems almost magical, or prophetic – she appeared when she was needed, and has virtually kept her silence ever since. Her Presidental Freedom Award means that she will soon get a chance to meet George Bush, and have a moment in the spotlight once more. Wouldn’t it be something if she found something else timely to say to the nation again?


DON’T miss the great cynsations interview with the very complex and thought-provoking Pooja Makhijani. She is, reportedly, “slowly working on a YA novel.” Much squealing here!


Oh, yeah, everybody’s excited over the tree-topper at Seven Impossible Things Before Breakfast — but do YOU have a Hanukkah bush? This would go with it perfectly.

History, MEM's, Odds & Ends

“So why do we teach history to our children? Is it for the glow of pleasure we get when we hear their cherubic little mouths repeating the names and dates of all the kings and queens since Edward the Confessor, each battle they fought, every treaty they signed and every head they (personally) struck from renegade shoulders? Or is history principally about humanity? Understanding when leadership becomes tyranny and why holocausts and genocides happen?”

Beth Webb, author of the fabulous Star Dancer series talks about fiction having just as much importance as fact when children select books on historical fiction. Is there a such thing as misleading children with the fictional aspects of historical fiction?


OH. MY. Can you spot the SINGLE correct usage in this window?!




Harper Lee has been known for years as one of the most reclusive writers in our modern world. Her book was so timely a reminder of the realities of segregation and the equal rights struggle that she seems almost magical, or prophetic – she appeared when she was needed, and has virtually kept her silence ever since. Her Presidental Freedom Award means that she will soon get a chance to meet George Bush, and have a moment in the spotlight once more. Wouldn’t it be something if she found something else timely to say to the nation again?


DON’T miss the great cynsations interview with the very complex and thought-provoking Pooja Makhijani. She is, reportedly, “slowly working on a YA novel.” Much squealing here!


Oh, yeah, everybody’s excited over the tree-topper at Seven Impossible Things Before Breakfast — but do YOU have a Hanukkah bush? This would go with it perfectly.

A "Healthy Debate" And Other Weekend Odd Ends

NPR‘s All Things Considered yesterday had a interesting little piece on the so-called “urban” or “ghetto” literature not meeting favor in all corners, something that has been a bit of a controversy for years. Author Terry McMillian has written a scathing letter to the head editors at Simon & Schuster, excoriating them for elevating hip-hop, street culture, for being complicit in the exploitation of African American girls and women, and for allowing poorly written, barely edited street trash to be promoted beyond more literary novels.

Of course, Terry McMillian has her own reasons for her fury, but I laughed as the pleasant voice of NPR’s correspondent said that this would contribute to a “healthy debate” on the topic of urban/ghetto lit. Debate — what a polite, classroom word! I think she meant to say ‘screaming arguments.’

Supporters of urban literature are so enthusiastic about it. They insist that there are no drawbacks to the books; minority teens are now reading. In 2006, a Newsweek report added, “Hip-hop fiction is doing for 15- to 25-year-old African-Americans what ‘Harry Potter’ did for kids,” says Matt Campbell, a buyer for Waldenbooks. “Getting a new audience excited about books.”

Written in some cases by incarcerated authors, with titles like Baby Momma Drama, A Gangster’s Girl and Project Chick, the tsk-tsk-ing has gotten pretty loud from worried and unhappy urban lit detractors. It reminds me of the anxiety produced by the soap opera-esque Gossip Girls series. People worried then as now that the books glorify a certain trashy lifestyle, make illegalities look attractive, reinforce stereotypes and allow other books by more mature and mainstream authors to be ignored.

That last bit is probably pretty true. The publishing industry seems to revolve on money and marketing, and Urban Lit is a massive money-maker; it sells sex, it sells sizzle, it sells all of the things that are easily accessible in cities, easily digestible, don’t require a dictionary, and major publishing companies have leaped to take part in what is seen as a sure thing, in all likelihood ignoring other worthy projects. Unfortunately, that’s just kind of the way things go. In many circles the question is brought up, “Is it literature?” but I’m not sure defining the parameters of literature would actually answer the question. What I think people really are asking is this: “Is this appropriate? Is it worthy? Is it okay to like this?”

I’ve been helping my niece write a novel for the last year. She’s just turned eighteen, and is dead serious about this tragic morality play she’s creating, where a Good Girl does Bad Things and Pays A Price. It’s almost Shakespearean in its simplicity, and it occurs to me that many of the ‘urban lit’ novels are just the same. After reveling in the drug culture, gambling, pimping and excess, quite a few of the novels end with jail or death — which might seem a strange end for young adult literature, but it does reveal cause and effect, and the books are being read…

When it comes down to it, young adults read what interests them, and questions about worth and appropriateness will have to be answered individually, as always. As much as I cringe over what I see to be as kind of …tacky, it’s everyone’s right to indulge in tacky as much as they want, and we would all fight tooth and nail for that right.

Within urban lit, there are good books, and not so good books, as with any genre. And, frankly, since I haven’t read more than a couple of books that come under the heading of “urban,” and I haven’t yet found anyone in the YA blogosphere who has read any of the KimaniTRU novels, much less reviewed anything else targeted to minority YA’s, I can’t make a judgment. I do think that the controversy is about to be revved up yet again, however, so I will stay tuned with interest…


Did you see Jules & Eisha went and got all popular and stuff? I mean, I knew they were the YA/MG/Picture Book blogosphere IT girls, but now they’re guest blogging at ForeWord Magazine. Eisha’s posting on YA novels dealing with depression – right after National Depression Screening Day, and Jules takes it next week. We can now say: we knew them when…


Don’t miss Miss Erin’s interview with D.M. Cornish, the author of Monster Blood Tattoo, the author-illustrated, complex novel that ended JUST as I was getting into it… And Big A, little a’s interview with Eric Luper, author of a really interesting YA book on, of all intriguing things… gambling. Another unusual YA topic!


The Cybils are blazing quite a trail! At last count, there were fifty-six Science Fiction/Fantasy nominations, and I don’t know how many in YA, picture books, Middle Grade, Non-Fiction and Poetry. If you haven’t’ already nominated your limit of one new book per category, what are you waiting for? And consider putting in your two cents at the Cybils Blog on what makes adults able to judge what is ‘kid-friendly.’ It is a REALLY good question as we, as teens and adults of various ages, set out once again to read for what we hope is an important award.


If you didn’t have a chance to read all the way through the Poetry Friday selections, there’s still time to check out The Book Mine Set challenge – a difficult, but unique poetic form I’d like to try writing for myself.


Well, there are books calling my name — and mugs of steaming tea, so happy weekend to you, may you wear sloppy clothes and read to your heart’s content.

Ten Five Things I Wish We’d Had Time to Cover at SCBWI

Five…four…three…two…one. Anonymity.

Sadly (and yet…) I have to leave the Conference today. No more name tags on a lanyard around my neck to make me cringe as people bend to study them (or, worse, for me to forget, and then wander around Beverly Hills advertising my name like a dork), and no more of the word ‘Faculty’ reminding me that I should be more helpful and assist people in finding their conference rooms (okay, I’d do that anyway, but this time people actually looked to me. Which was sad, since I actually walked into a dead-end hallway trying to find an exit. Twice.). Probably the nicest thing about being a screen name instead of a real-life person will be the lack of cameras (ahem). I hate to leave early, because there’s still so much great stuff, but final revisions for my next novel (!!!!) — and preparing for a massive garage sale — beckon.

Since the haze of horror from actually having to speak in public is somewhat fading, I’ve been analyzing what we said — and what I dearly wished we’d had a chance to cover… and cover again… and cover again… and repeat (but it was only an hour, thankfully… and alas). These are a few points I would wish anyone wanting to know about the kidlitosphere blogworld to ponder:

1.) There is a difference between we bloggers who are writers, and bloggers who are readers and reviewers and book ‘recommenders’ – and a difference between booksellers and librarians and parents and teachers. We have different points of view. We introduced ourselves to indicate to you where we came from in our different walks of life. We are not all the same. There is, however, a similarity as well. We. All. Love. Books. That’s why the kidlit blogosphere exists.

2.) Our talk was not about what blogging could do for you. Our talk was about what blogging and the kidlitosphere has done for us. There is still time to attend a session by C.L. Smith (or Roxyanne Young or any of the people who list blogging and finance together) and get more of the other angle. Check your Conference schedule.

3.) Our talk was not a how-to of blogging, and we’re really sorry if people came to our presentation expecting a network lesson. Do a search on ‘how to blog’ or check blogger.com for step-by-step details to create your own. We learned by trial and error — we firmly believe that you can, too.

4.) We never intended to provide marketing assistance to any one population (we’re lookin’ at YOU, Oz.). We do not presume to have read all the books in the world, including yours, so any confrontational accusation that we haven’t reviewed your book? Means… nothing. We still might not review your book. We don’t run a review service. However. Many bloggers in the kidlitosphere are contacted regularly by publishers and have books sent to them. We love books, and we’re always happy to get more. This does not constitute any kind of agreement to review your book, advertise for you, or … anything, really. Which leads me to another thought, which is not really a point, but more of a soapbox rant from observing some weird interactions yesterday, so we won’t count it:

(Aside:) Blogging is a largely anonymous pursuit. As the moon only shows one face, so do you only know one facet of any blogger you ‘think’ you know. For instance, Nerdfighter you may know yourself to be, you do not know John Green. Cult of Castellucci? I’m all over it. But you won’t see me running up to the poor woman and flinging myself at her. I’m just sayin’.

5.) Our corner of the kidlitosphere is more about dialoguing about children’s literature, because that is our area of interest to us, than it is about any particular aspect of our professional careers – developing or promoting ourselves as authors. As authors, we tend to be inward looking, and focus so closely on our own work that we lose sight of the rest of our milieu. Blogging helps me, at least, balance that laser-focus with a view of other worlds, other books and styles I might not encounter, and other people.

*************

Okay, I wanted to rant for ten things? But John Green speaks on All Writing is Rewriting at 9:30, and then there’s Tamora Pierce morning workshop, so I’ll get back to this…

Ten Five Things I Wish We'd Had Time to Cover at SCBWI

Five…four…three…two…one. Anonymity.

Sadly (and yet…) I have to leave the Conference today. No more name tags on a lanyard around my neck to make me cringe as people bend to study them (or, worse, for me to forget, and then wander around Beverly Hills advertising my name like a dork), and no more of the word ‘Faculty’ reminding me that I should be more helpful and assist people in finding their conference rooms (okay, I’d do that anyway, but this time people actually looked to me. Which was sad, since I actually walked into a dead-end hallway trying to find an exit. Twice.). Probably the nicest thing about being a screen name instead of a real-life person will be the lack of cameras (ahem). I hate to leave early, because there’s still so much great stuff, but final revisions for my next novel (!!!!) — and preparing for a massive garage sale — beckon.

Since the haze of horror from actually having to speak in public is somewhat fading, I’ve been analyzing what we said — and what I dearly wished we’d had a chance to cover… and cover again… and cover again… and repeat (but it was only an hour, thankfully… and alas). These are a few points I would wish anyone wanting to know about the kidlitosphere blogworld to ponder:

1.) There is a difference between we bloggers who are writers, and bloggers who are readers and reviewers and book ‘recommenders’ – and a difference between booksellers and librarians and parents and teachers. We have different points of view. We introduced ourselves to indicate to you where we came from in our different walks of life. We are not all the same. There is, however, a similarity as well. We. All. Love. Books. That’s why the kidlit blogosphere exists.

2.) Our talk was not about what blogging could do for you. Our talk was about what blogging and the kidlitosphere has done for us. There is still time to attend a session by C.L. Smith (or Roxyanne Young or any of the people who list blogging and finance together) and get more of the other angle. Check your Conference schedule.

3.) Our talk was not a how-to of blogging, and we’re really sorry if people came to our presentation expecting a network lesson. Do a search on ‘how to blog’ or check blogger.com for step-by-step details to create your own. We learned by trial and error — we firmly believe that you can, too.

4.) We never intended to provide marketing assistance to any one population (we’re lookin’ at YOU, Oz.). We do not presume to have read all the books in the world, including yours, so any confrontational accusation that we haven’t reviewed your book? Means… nothing. We still might not review your book. We don’t run a review service. However. Many bloggers in the kidlitosphere are contacted regularly by publishers and have books sent to them. We love books, and we’re always happy to get more. This does not constitute any kind of agreement to review your book, advertise for you, or … anything, really. Which leads me to another thought, which is not really a point, but more of a soapbox rant from observing some weird interactions yesterday, so we won’t count it:

(Aside:) Blogging is a largely anonymous pursuit. As the moon only shows one face, so do you only know one facet of any blogger you ‘think’ you know. For instance, Nerdfighter you may know yourself to be, you do not know John Green. Cult of Castellucci? I’m all over it. But you won’t see me running up to the poor woman and flinging myself at her. I’m just sayin’.

5.) Our corner of the kidlitosphere is more about dialoguing about children’s literature, because that is our area of interest to us, than it is about any particular aspect of our professional careers – developing or promoting ourselves as authors. As authors, we tend to be inward looking, and focus so closely on our own work that we lose sight of the rest of our milieu. Blogging helps me, at least, balance that laser-focus with a view of other worlds, other books and styles I might not encounter, and other people.

*************

Okay, I wanted to rant for ten things? But John Green speaks on All Writing is Rewriting at 9:30, and then there’s Tamora Pierce morning workshop, so I’ll get back to this…

Life is Busy, Art is Short. Focus on the Art.

Ὁ βίος βραχύς, ἡ δὲ τέχνη μακρή, ὁ δὲ καιρὸς ὀξὺς, ἡ δὲ πεῖρα σφαλερὴ, ἡ δὲ κρίσις χαλεπή.

Life is short, [the] art long, opportunity fleeting, experiment treacherous, judgment difficult. – Hippocrates

Last week was difficult — trying hard to focus and shut out the world long enough to work. I have gotten good at ignoring the world around me {EDIT: that’s an outright lie, incidentally, but we post what makes us look good. Maybe I can say I have gotten *better* because I resigned from a Committee… right before we found out we were leaving the country. Progress. Of a sort.}, but now that my time here among family and friends is dwindling, I’ve begun feeling guilty about shutting people out.

Many, many people never really have understood that writing requires time to stare out the window and doodle on sticky notes before lucidity sifts through the morning haze or inspiration suddenly strikes, and so they have started to push a bit, chiding, “well, you don’t have to do that all day,” and suggesting archly that I pop over and bring them the contents of my cupboard (“well, what are you guys planning to do with your garden goodies?”) or meet them somewhere for coffee. As much as I love everyone {EDIT: HAH. Again. Isn’t this girl nice? Is she getting on your nerves yet?}, I am beginning to think that I should commit this poem to memory, and begin reciting it under my breath at opportune moments.

“The Art of Disappearing” by Naomi Shihab Nye from Words Under the Words: Selected Poems. © The Eighth Mountain Press.

The Art of Disappearing


When they say Don’t I know you?

say no.

When they invite you to the party

remember what parties are like

before answering.

Someone telling you in a loud voice

they once wrote a poem.

Greasy sausage balls on a paper plate.

Then reply.

If they say We should get together

say why?

It’s not that you don’t love them anymore.

You’re trying to remember something

too important to forget.

Trees. The monastery bell at twilight.

Tell them you have a new project.

It will never be finished.

When someone recognizes you in a grocery store

nod briefly and become a cabbage.

When someone you haven’t seen in ten years

appears at the door,

don’t start singing him all your new songs.

You will never catch up.

Walk around feeling like a leaf.

Know you could tumble any second.

Then decide what to do with your time.

Hippocrates meant that the art of medicine is long — and broad and deep and full of questions which he in his short life could not hope to touch. I think writers — even, and perhaps especially young adult writers — need to take ourselves and our art and our perspectives just as seriously. Unplug the phone. Set aside time from spouses or students or dependents, and give yourself time to dig into that which you dream – whatever it may be. It’s not harsh to make time for you.

{EDIT: These are the bits I edited out last night; I a.) begged Himself to phone the couple back, twice, and say “forget it, we’re on,” – fortunately they had gone out, and he refused to call their cellphones, b.) woke early this morning prepared to mail them an apology card – no email, thanks, this is etiquette, and I’d blown it, c.) apologized all day yesterday for going upstairs and refusing to put on company clothes for the person who dropped in (“well, we’re just in the area”) to introduce their perhaps future spouse, c.) felt miserable and mean and petty and small for my soul’s objections, that no one would like me or think I was nice, that the Beeyatch Patrol was going to come for me because I was deliberately flaunting the Nice Girl Law that says you MUST do what everyone wants or be thought that b-word, that I was digging my own grave and would be miserable and alone (despite the fact that I am an introvert with a public persona, and a writer, and alone time for me is usually… good)

But then. I found out that Robin has the same disease, except her Inner Child is a lot more mature than mine – it still listens to the Older Wiser Child. Mine needs a time out. Bless you, Robin, for articulating this, and doubly bless you, Jules, for breaking your own blogation/vacation to point our Robin’s thoughts to me. It’s a lifesaving kind of daisy chain, and today we both may keep our heads a little higher above the water and actually get something done.}


Ezine‘Bread & Circus’ has a few words on YA authors – mainly, that it’s time to just leave them alone… hopefully to write.

Another week already. Be well.

Writerly Scatter-wittedness

I just need to accept that I’m not getting anything done today.

It rained a little this morning, and so at six-thirty I was wrestling gleefully with my garden, tying things on stakes, and enjoying the cool — which I thought would dissipate. THREE HOURS LATER, I’m still pulling weeds and look up — oops! — at the time. It was still cool and dim and I just… lost track.

Running errands and “dropping by” my parents house to pick something up meant a nice long ramble with my grandmother, who is lovely but often vague and begins conversations mid-topic, and insists on confusing me with my sister who has the two week old infant. (She invariably asks, with alarm and accusation, “Where did you leave that boy?!” And I try to say as gently as possible, “With his mother?”)

Extricating myself from THAT conversation and finally getting home meant a backlog of email, which I dallied through, and then finally, FINALLY opening my revision and beginning the grunt work of hacking away… Only to find my sister, whose best friend lives two doors down, had dropped in for a “chat.” And so I hurried downstairs from my office and chatted with two eleven-year-olds for roughly an hour. Never mind that my protagonist is in a car on a boring cross-country trip with her sister and grandmother, and has just discovered the hotel they’re staying in has a guest bathrobe and a mini bar. No, I clung to reality and talked with my guests about the new 6th grade teacher, Ms. Carmen, who bought them Slurpees last year and how she’s moving to England to get married, and how much that sucked, because my sister and her friend thought she was nice, and wasn’t it a long engagement, because didn’t she show them that ring in something like third grade?

I love having eleven-year-old friends. They are awfully diverting. But they were NOT helping me toward my goal of a chapter a day on the last two weeks of my revision.

Finally, back to work… with a side trip. Via Bookshelves of Doom, I discovered the joyousness that is the Literary Gas guy, and through him I found… book… perfume. Leather… or clothbound, with a hint of mildew… Which reminded me that for a Super Special Project happening at the end of August, I have a 1952 FIRST EDITION of a book by an author whom I LOVED as a kid that has that wonderful musty smell of old-book-but-new-to-me. I thought, I could start that… just a chapter… if I write JUST a chapter… if I get that done, I’ll run a bath, and read for two hours.

I thought I could manage that – one chapter = two hours of bath and book.

Unfortunately, Chasing Ray’s post really got me thinking about war, and I had to take some time to jot down some musings in a notebook. Technically, this could be construed as working… but not quite. Read the piece for yourself: it will make you write things down, too. (Probably things with four letters.) Writing thoughtful essays: not working on my FICTION piece.

You know, at Read*Write*Believe, I learned about the Writer Hating Bus… and realized that it was probably idling downstairs in front of my house. THIS REVISION IS DOOMED.

For today, at least.
We’ll see about tomorrow.

Briefly

Via Read Roger, I have discovered yet another potential client for MotherReader’s BACA Club – poor old Skatey Katy, a book by famously bob-haired 70’s (80’s?) figure-skater Dorothy Hamil, currently being voted on by the …voting public.

How, you may ask, does that work? According to the NY Times:

“Media Predict is soliciting book proposals from agents and the public, and posting pages of them on the site. Traders, who are given $5,000 in fantasy cash, can buy shares based on their guess about whether a particular book proposal is likely to get a deal, or whether Touchstone Books, an imprint of Simon & Schuster, will select it as a finalist in a contest called Project Publish. If either happens within a four-month period, the value of the shares go to $100 apiece; if not, the share price falls to zero.”

Yeah. I’m sort of horrified, to be honest. (Sort of? Let’s try really horrified.) It’s not enough that writers have to jump through untold hoops to get published at all (Oh, no, I used colored stationery and festive stamps on my query letter. It will get rejected in the mail room, no editor will ever see it!!), now it seems at Simon & Schuster, anyway, that American Idol has become a mindset in which people other than publishing professionals are… betting on my success or failure? Um, hello…? And people are upset with bloggers for daring to express opinions on books!?

I think I like the model – clunky and outdated though it might be – of editors reading book proposals and trying to base their decisions on their own opinions. It’s not foolproof by any means, and it’s based just as much on editorial quirk as true merit, which is hard to divine in any case, but it’s better than the idea of a popularity contest. Even in middle school, I never won any of those…

Besides wishing I were a comic book artist, I’ve also occasionally wished that I were a sculptor, which is why I am endlessly fascinated with the creative use of books — not only are books great as time machines and transport vehicles to spirit you away, they also make good…
clocks. And apparently also birdhouses.

You’ll be glad to note than I am going garage sale scrounging for books to turn into some …thing. A la This Into That, my project is going to be wildly creative and beautiful, will speak volumes (heh) to the world of art and literature, and will leave intellectuals breathless.

Of course, the greater likelihood is that I am going to be the proud owner of a bunch of really old books, but what the hey, huh?


I am still trying to wrap my head around recent news reports. Words fail. For insightful commentary, visit Colleen and CK’s blogs.